Many questions have been raised about how he was convicted when the women willingly accepted his advances and wanted jobs in return.
It was the Penn state supreme court that overturned the conviction, because his rights were violated.
What about the rights of the women he drugged! Possibly agreeing to sex is one thing, drugging is not.
Post a Comment
2 comments:
It was the Penn state supreme court that overturned the conviction, because his rights were violated.
What about the rights of the women he drugged! Possibly agreeing to sex is one thing, drugging is not.
Post a Comment